Ghoulish science + ObamaCare= health hazard, July 24, 2009
I can’t begin to tell you how much I enjoyed this post. It inspired me to cleave deeply through a lot of bullshit, written by anyone who feels the need to write bullshit. Granted I put myself in that category sometimes, but at least I can qualify my actions. People like Michelle Malkin cannot. You see, it’s in her best interest to spread the most egregious lies and distortions, and pass them off as truth. Her reputation is made by fear-mongering, so why not engage in it at a high level? Enough about that, let’s get into the meat of Ms. Malkin’s rant:
Gulp. It’s precisely the Obama administration’s view of sound “science” that should send chills down patients’ spines. Case in point: The president’s prestigious science czar John Holdren refuses to answer questions about his radical, published work on population control over the last 30 years.
Last week, I called the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) to press Holdren on his views about forced abortions and mass sterilizations; his purported disavowal of Ecoscience, the 1977 book he co-authored with population control zealots Paul and Anne Ehrlich; and his continued embrace of forced-abortion advocate and eugenics guru Harrison Brown, whom he credits with inspiring him to become a scientist.
After investigative bloggers and this column reprinted extensive excerpts from Ecoscience, which mused openly about putting sterilants in the water supply to make women infertile and engineering society by taking away babies from undesirables and subjecting them to government-mandated abortions, the White House issued a statement from Holdren last week denying he embraced those proposals. The Ehrlichs challenged critics to read their and Holdren’s more recent research and works….
Wow. Really heady stuff there right? I took it upon myself to write a piece back in August, rebutting Ms. Malkin’s ridiculous assumptions about Mr. Holdren– and his scientific philosophy– using actual facts, and not wild, loopy theories. I was only to happy to do it. Ms. Malkin truly disgusts me.
This post was a favorite of mine not for its contents or the author’s political acumen, but for the pure inspiration I derived from it. It made me truly focus, and more determined to expose frauds passing themselves off as honest journalists. Thank you Ms. Malkin. I look forward to your work in the year 2010.
No related posts.
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
No Comments so far ↓
There are no comments yet...Kick things off by filling out the form below.